Connect with us

Benghazi Coverup

45 Page Analysis Of Report Shows Conclusively That Hillary Misled America About Benghazi Murders

Benghazi Committee’s investigative report released Tuesday shows conclusively that Hillary Clinton misled America about Benghazi murders.

Published

on

benghazi-coverup-murders-hillary-clinton-innocence-of-muslims-video-lie-2016
NOW THE END BEGINS SHARE:

A 45-page analysis of the Benghazi Committee’s investigative report released Tuesday by a pair of Republican congressmen lays out in devastating detail the lengths to which Hillary Clinton went to obscure the motives behind the murder of four Americans in Libya in 2012.

The attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others on Sept. 11, 2012. Reps. Jim Jordan and Mike Pompeo amassed ample evidence that then-Secretary of State Clinton quickly learned that the killings resulted from a organized terrorist attack.

“Yet, Secretary Clinton and the administration told one story privately — that Benghazi was a terrorist attack — and told another story publicly — blaming a video-inspired protest,” wrote Jordan and Pompeo, who said they wrote their report to highlight what they regard as the most important parts of the forthcoming official report of the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

Hillary Clinton Makes Statement On Benghazi Report | MSNBC

Hillary wants you to, please, stop investigating what really happened in Benghazi. It’s wearing her out and she would very much appreciate it if we could all just move on. After all, what difference at this point does it really make? Thank you.

Indeed, in her Oct. 22 testimony before the Select Committee, Clinton blamed conflicting reports for the differences in her public and private statements on the motivations behind the attack. The report issued Tuesday by Jordan and Pompeo indicates there was overwhelming and immediate evidence in Clinton’s hands that it was a coordinated attack that had nothing to do with the video.

Democrats on the committee released their own report Monday, dismissing the investigation as “the ongoing Republican obsession with conspiracy theories that have no basis in reality.”

But it is hard to refute the written record showing Clinton and other administration officials clinging to their story that the attack started as a spontaneous protest over on obscure anti-Muslim internet video made by an American. Here is a timeline in the report:

Sept. 11, 2012
What they said in public: Clinton issued a statement at 10:08 p.m., before the attack was even over: “Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the internet.”

Hillary Clinton’s Fiery Moment at Benghazi Hearing:

What they said in private: Hours earlier, though, at 6:49 p.m., Clinton told Libyan President Mohammed al Magariaf that there was “a gun battle ongoing, which I understand Ansar as-Sharia [sic] is claiming responsibility for.” In an email to daughter Chelsea at 11:23 p.m., she made no mention of the video. “Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an Al Qaeda-like [sic] group.”

Sept. 12, 2012
What they said in public: Clinton said in public remarks that officials were trying to determine the motives for the assault. “Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior, along with the protest that took place at our embassy in Cairo yesterday, as a response to inflammatory material posted on the internet,” she said.

What they said in private: In a summary of a call between Acting Assistant Secretary Beth Jones and Libyan Ambassador Ali Aujali, Jones said, “I told him that the group that conducted the attacks — Ansar Al Sharia — is affiliated with Islamic extremists.”

Mother of Benghazi victim fires back at Hillary Clinton:

An email from State Department official Jacob Sullivan to the U.S. embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, rejected the public contention that the attack in Libya was linked to a protest that had occurred in Cairo, Egypt.

“There was not really violence in Egypt [and] we are not saying that the violence in Libya erupted ‘over inflammatory videos,'” he wrote.

Clinton herself rejected the protest theory in a statement to then-Egyptian Prime Minister Hesham Mohamed Qandil: “We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack — not a protest … Based on the information we saw today we believe the group that claimed responsibility for this was affiliated with al Qaeda.”

Under Secretary Patrick Kennedy, in briefing with congressional staff, said, “No, the attack was a direct breaching attack.” He also differentiated it from the Cairo incident. “Attack in Cairo was a demonstration. There were no weapons shown or used. A few cans of spray paint.”

Sept. 13, 2012
What they said in public: In remarks in Morocco, Clinton again blamed the online anti-Muslim film. “To us, to me personally, this video is disgusting and reprehensible. It appears to have a deeply cynical purpose: to denigrate a great religion and to provoke rage.”

Obama and Hillary Blame Youtube Video for Benghazi Terrorist Attack as Coffins Arrive:

Even as the words first came out of her mouth, Hillary knew that blaming the terror attack on a video was a complete and total lie. But that’s what liars do. They lie.

What they said in private: A summary of a call between Deputy Secretary Thomas Nides and the Egyptian ambassador to the United States states: “Nides said he understood the difference between the targeted attack in Libya and the way the protest escalated in Egypt.”

Sept. 14, 2012
What they said in public: White House press secretary Jay Carey said at a news conference, “We have no information to suggest that it was a pre-planned attack. The unrest we’ve seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims find offensive.”

That is consistent with an email sent that evening by White House adviser Ben Rhodes to Carney and others that it was important “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.”

The father of Tyrone Woods, one of the fallen Americans, wrote in his diary that during a ceremony for the return of his son’s body, “I gave Hillary a hug and shook her hand, and she said we are going to have the filmmaker arrested who was responsible for the death of my son.”

The mother of another victim, Sean Smith, similarly said, “We were nose-to-nose at the coffin ceremony. She told me it was the fault of the video. I said ‘Are you sure?’ She says, ‘Yes, that’s what it was … it was the video.'”

What they said in private: An email from a State Department press officer in the embassy in Tripoli urged colleagues not to draw attention to the video. “And it is becoming increasingly clear that the series of events in Benghazi was much more terrorist attack than a protest which escalated into violence,” the officer wrote.

Sept. 15, 2012
What they said in public: That did not stop President Obama in his weekly radio address from declaring that the “tragic attack takes place at a time of turmoil and protest in many different countries.”

What they said in private: Clinton made no mention of a protest or video in call with the Libyan prime minister-elect.

Sept. 16, 2012
What they said in public: U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, in interview with Chris Wallace on Fox News Channel, said, “But we don’t see at this point signs this was a coordinated plan, premeditated attack.”

What they said in private: In an email to media officers, a public affairs officer at the U.S. embassy in Libya wrote that there was evidence that a second attack on the diplomatic mission’s safe house could not have occurred without coordination and organization by the attackers. “This goes against statements that the attacks were not carried out by a single group but by an angry multitude protesting,” the officer wrote.

Sept 17, 2012
What they said in public: State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland stood by Rice’s remarks on the Sunday news shows. “Ambassador Rice, in her comments on every network over the weekend, was very clear, very precise, about what our initial assessment of what happened is,” she said.

What they said in private: Responding to instructions to link the attack in Benghazi to the protest in Egypt, a press officer in Libya wrote in an email, “I really hope this was revised. I don’t think we should go on the record on this.”

Sept. 18, 2012
What they said in public: Carney told reporters, “I would point you to what Ambassador Rice said and others have said about what we know thus far about the video and its influence on the protests that occurred in Cairo, in Benghazi and elsewhere.”

What they said in private: In a written statement to a congressional panel, Deputy CIA Director Michael Morrell wrote, “The critically important point is that the analysts considered this a terrorist attack from the very beginning.”

In an email exchange about an article quoting White House officials as seeing no signs of a premeditated attack, one State Department security agent asked another, “Can you believe this?” The second agent asked the first if there had been any rioting reported in Benghazi before the attack.

“Zip, nothing, nada,” the agent responded.

Sept. 19, 2016
What they said in public: In a cable to all U.S. embassies, Clinton warned of widespread violence at diplomatic posts across the Muslim world. “The proximate cause of the violence was the release by individuals in the United States of the video trailer for a film that many Muslims find offensive,” she wrote.

Sept. 20, 2012
What they said in public: At a Univision Town Hall event, Obama was still trying to determine what happened in Libya. “What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests.” source

9/11 Explained

Let’s Not Forget The Other 9/11 When Barack Obama And Hillary Clinton Refused Military Support To The 4 Americans Ambushed In Benghazi

On September 11, 2012, al-Qaeda terrorists attacked the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, killing U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and others.

Published

on

hillary-clinton-barack-obama-september-11-2012-benghazi-christopher-stevens-glen-doherty-sean-smith-tyrone-woods-murdered-what-difference-does-it-make
NOW THE END BEGINS SHARE:

On September 11, 2012, al-Qaeda terrorists attacked the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, killing U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and others. They made a desperate call for military backup, but denied by Sec’y of State Hillary Clinton, and lied about by President Obama.

Funny thing about everyone posting all those heartrending tweets today about 9/11 back in 2001, because almost no one is remembering that 9/11 2012 was the day that U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was left to die in Benghazi, along with Information Officer Sean Smith, and two CIA operatives, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, both former Navy SEALs. When the trouble started, they made a desperate call to the Obama government for military support, and were denied. How come no one is remembering them today? They are intentionally forgotten, and for good reason.

“And it came to pass in the morning, that David wrote a letter to Joab, and sent it by the hand of Uriah. And he wrote in the letter, saying, Set ye Uriah in the forefront of the hottest battle, and retire ye from him, that he may be smitten, and die.” 2 Samuel 11:14,15 (KJB)

Below you will read an article from 2016, written back when Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were still in power. Read it, and remember the true scandal of that on 9/11 day in 2012 when the United States government authorized the murder of its own Benghazi ambassador and 3 others, mostly to cover up its own illegal weapons running operation. Just like the ‘Fast And Furious‘ gun-running operation that also resulted in the death of an US government employee.

Christopher Stevens was not only murdered, his dead body was then sodomized by his Muslim assailants who were allowed to lay siege to the US Embassy in Libya because the Obama government intentionally left them there to die. Then they lied about it. Remember that on this 19th anniversary of 9/11 2001, and the 8th anniversary of 9/11 2012. Because the real 9/11 is not only about tragic events, it’s also about murder and government cover-up.

Let’s never forget that. Benghazi ain’t going away.

benghazi-coverup-murders-hillary-clinton-innocence-of-muslims-video-lie-2016

45 PAGE ANALYSIS OF REPORT SHOWS CONCLUSIVELY THAT HILLARY MISLED AMERICA ABOUT BENGHAZI MURDERS

All this cloak and dagger activity does not obscure the fact that U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens begged Hillary for additional military security at the diplomatic compound in Benghazi weeks before the massacre, and Hillary refused to provide it.

FROM MEDIUM: As we know, there’s nothing Hillary Clinton — a power-crazy politician whose personality borders on sociopathic — won’t say or do to get elected U.S. President. But forget about her greed and the $675,000 in fees she was paid by investment firm Goldman Sachs for three speaking engagements at $225,000 each.

And the millions of dollars in foreign contributions given to the Clinton Foundation while she was Secretary of State.

And what about Hillary’s private home e-mail account for State Department communiques allowing her to shirk federal record keeping policies — even though some 60,000 e-mails were involved, including 30,000 she reportedly deleted.

Yes, those activities are appalling and scandalous. But there’s another reason Hillary should be locked in prison for a very long time: Denying repeated requests for help, for additional security for Americans, at our embassy in Benghazi, and then lying to the country, to the American people, about the reasons for the Benghazi massacre, and then the most egregious — lying to the families of the American servicemen who were murdered there…blaming the deaths on an American and his satirical video.

Unbelievable? You bet — But, of course, that’s just what sociopaths do. They are pathological liars. They lack feelings of shame, remorse or guilt. Their emotions are shallow. They need constant stimuli to help fuel their grandiose egos. And they are very charming — and use that charm to gain your trust and achieve their objective — control.

On September 11, 2012, al-Qaeda terrorists attacked the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, killing U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and others. But both Hillary and President Obama told us, the country, that the attack, which occurred on the 9/11 anniversary of the World Trade Center tragedy, was a response to an anti-Islamic video on YouTube produced by an American!

Hillary Lies as Families Wept

Two days later, the corpses of Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen A. Doherty and Tyrone Woods were returned to the United States for a ceremony at Andrews Air Force Base. As the bodies were moved from a military jet to hearses on the tarmac, their families wept.

Hillary Clinton, present at the ceremony with Obama and Vice President Biden, said in her public remarks: “We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing to do with.”

But according to four family members of those killed in Benghazi, Hillary privately told them, “We are going to have the filmmaker arrested who was responsible for the death of your son.” (Hillary has since denied that.)

Obama added, “We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification for this type of senseless violence. None.” And, supporting the lie, Obama’s press secretary, Jay Carney, said, “We have no information to suggest that it was a planned attack.”

  • But Judicial Watch.org tells a different story about the Benghazi massacre.

Judicial Watch is a nonprofit organization that assesses accountability and integrity in government. It reported that “previously classified ‘Secret’ documents from the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department of State revealed that DOD almost immediately reported that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was committed by the al Qaeda-linked ‘Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman’ (BOCAR) and had been planned at least ten days in advance.’” (Note: Rahman is serving life in prison for his involvement in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.)

Secret Documents

Judicial Watch also reported that the secret documents were released in response to a court order resulting from a May, 2014, Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed against the DOD and State Department. That lawsuit sought “communications between the two agencies and congressional leaders on matters related to the activities of any agency or department of the U.S. government at the Special Mission Compound and/or classified annex in Benghazi.”

“A Defense Department document from the Defense Intelligence Agency, dated September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack, details that the attack on the compound had been carefully planned by the BOCAR terrorist group to kill as many Americans as possible,” Judicial Watch reported.

That document was sent to then-Secretary of State Clinton, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Obama White House National Security Council. The terrorist attack, in part, was to celebrate the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center attacks.

So Hillary already knew the truth about Benghazi — but she lied anyway.

In his article published in National Review last October, the journalist Deroy Murdock wrote “Clinton issued a statement on the attack at 10:32 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on September 11, 2012 (the day of the attack). It read, in part: ‘Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.’ But that was a lie. At 11:12 p.m., just 40 minutes later, Hillary e-mailed her daughter, Chelsea, with the truth: ‘Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an al Qaeda-like group.’”

The next day, in a speech at the State Department, Hillary lied again when she said, “Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior, along with the protest that took place at our embassy in Cairo yesterday, as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet…America’s commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear — there is no justification for this, none.”

No justification? Really, Hillary? Are you saying the Department of Defense and Defense Intelligence Agency explanation that the attack was retaliation for U.S. imprisonment of terrorist leader Abdul Rahman and to memorialize the World Trade Center attacks was wrong?

Or… Are you just perpetuating the myth — the lie — that an American and his YouTube video was responsible for the massacre?

Benghazi Gun Running

Other watchdog organizations think otherwise, including those that claim Obama’s administration endorsed or managed gun-running operations through the port of Benghazi. For example, The FederalistPapers.org and Fox News reported this:

  • “U.S. Intelligence agencies were fully aware that weapons were moving from the terrorist stronghold in Libya to Syria before the attack that killed four Americans…
  • “September 16, 2012 DIA Memo copied to the National Security Council, CIA, and others concluded the Benghazi terrorist attack was planned at least ten or more days in advance…
  • “The memo also tied the attack to 9–11… No discussion of a demonstration or anti-Mohammad video.
  • “U.S. officials were aware that weapons were being shipped to Syria by the Port of Benghazi.
  • “The theory has long been circulated that the State Department was indeed moving guns off the radar from Libya through Turkey to Syria to support Islamic revolutionary groups there. It has been alleged that this gun running operation is connected to the attacks on the US consulate.”

And here’s the smoking gun:

The Washington Times reported that the existence of an end-use certificate from the State Department’s office of trade defense controls showed that Dolarian Capital, Inc. of Fresno, California, had been licensed to ship to Libya weapons that included rocket launchers, grenade launchers, 7,000 machine guns and eight million rounds of ammunition.

So, who was getting these weapons? Al-Qaida- and Muslim Brotherhood-dominated Libyan rebels were getting them — in other words, the same bad guys that America is fighting in the War on Terror. So why was a company in California authorized by the State Department to send weapons through the port of Benghazi to our enemies?

One theory is the U.S. wanted to oust Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi and the bad guys were trying to bring down his regime.

National Security Disaster

But there is much dispute about this gun-running conspiracy published on the Internet, lots of claims that is it untrue, plus lots of information purported to be true, including statements by Clare Lopez. She is a former operations officer for the CIA who is currently vice president for research at the Washington-based Center for Security Policy.

Lopez considers the Benghazi massacre a total and complete national security disaster resulting from lack of leadership by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Lopez said she sees a pattern in Obama’s actions, or inactions, that reveal his blueprint for the Middle East and Northern Africa is to allow the warring jihadi factions — the Sunnis and the Shiites — to divide the region into two spheres of influence, and for the U.S. to withdraw.

“The administration’s plan, I believe, is to remove American power and influence, including military forces, from Islamic lands,” Lopez told WND, an independent news organization.

When WND noted that was exactly what Osama bin Laden had demanded, Lopez pointed out that is the aim of all jihads, “Because that is what Islam demands, that foreign forces be kicked out of Islamic lands.”

All this cloak and dagger activity does not obscure the fact that U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens begged Hillary for additional military security at the diplomatic compound in Benghazi weeks before the massacre, and Hillary refused to provide it.

It doesn’t change the fact that Hillary and Obama lied to the entire world and to the families of the people killed in the attack — at the very moments that those families were grieving and most vulnerable. Why did Hillary and Obama lie about Benghazi — and so much else? After all, their priority is supposed to be the safety and security of our country and its citizens. Why did they twist the facts and hide the truth?

Here’s what I think: The fact is that the Benghazi massacre occurred less than one month before the 2012 presidential election. Between the day of the massacre on September 11 and election day in early November, Obama publicly described al Qaeda as being “decimated,” “on the path to defeat,” “on the run” or in similar terms at least 32 times! And Obama was campaigning … remember he had “the JV team on the run.”

And guess who echoed Obama’s claims? The woman who thinks she should be our next President. Indeed. With Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, there’s living proof that “All power corruptsand absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

None of this corruption is possible without an uninformed electorate. Think about the Democratic presidential candidates — one a socialist, the other a liar who allowed the deaths of four Americans at our embassy in Benghazi, Libya — and she and our president lied about it…without consequences. Their corruption, their crimes, unacknowledged without consequences are absolutely the fault of the electorate. You and me. READ MORE

Hillary Clinton On Benghazi Murders: ‘What difference at this point does it make?’

Now The End Begins is your front line defense against the rising tide of darkness in the last Days before the Rapture of the Church

When you contribute to this fundraising effort, you are helping us to do what the Lord called us to do. The money you send in goes primarily to the overall daily operations of this site. When people ask for Bibles, we send them out at no charge. When people write in and say how much they would like gospel tracts but cannot afford them, we send them a box at no cost to them for either the tracts or the shipping, no matter where they are in the world. Even all the way to South Africa. We even restarted our weekly radio Bible study on Sunday nights again, thanks to your generous donations. All this is possible because YOU pray for us, YOU support us, and YOU give so we can continue growing.

But whatever you do, don’t do nothing. Time is short and we need your help right now. If every one of the 15,600+ people on our daily mailing list gave $4.50, we would reach our goal immediately. If every one of our 150,000+ followers on Facebook gave $1.00 each, we would reach 300% of our goal. The same goes for our 15,900 followers on Twitter. But sadly, many will not give, so we need the ones who can and who will give to be generous. As generous as possible.

“Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;” Titus 2:13 (KJV)

“Thank you very much!” – Geoffrey, editor-in-chief, NTEB

 


 

 

 

Continue Reading

Barack Hussein Obama

CARELESS WHISPER: Creepy Joe Biden Needs Your Help In Remembering All The Scandals That Were Generated During His 8 Years In The Obama Administration

Creepy Joe Biden has launched his 2020 campaign on the supposition the the Obama administration existed for 8 years without a ‘whisper of scandal’

Published

on

creepy-joe-biden-says-barack-obama-administration-scandal-free
NOW THE END BEGINS SHARE:

The Obama administration used the 1917 Espionage Act with unprecedented vigor, prosecuting more people under that law for leaking sensitive information to the public than all previous administrations combined.

The presidency of Barack Hussein Obama was filled to overflowing with lies, deceit, deception and scandals. In this article we will endeavor to remind you of the most egregious of them. Why would we do that now in 2019, years after Obama is no longer president? Because Obama’s vice president, Creepy Joe Biden, has launched his campaign on the supposition the the Obama administration, of which he was a part, remained ‘scandal free‘ for the 8 years it existed. His exact words on ‘The View’, as you can see in the video below, was that there was not a ‘whisper of scandal’ at any time in the Obama administration.

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda

This obviously is a lie, but it is a lie that, as you will see, is being repeated not only by Biden but by the fake news Liberal media as well. If Joseph Goebbels could get a 5-minute break from burning in Hell to be able to read this story, I think he would be quite proud of the lie Biden and his people are currently telling. Because that’s what Hitler and the Nazis did, they looked straight into the camera and said things that were 100% not true, repeating them over and over until  you believed it. So with that, let us take a little stroll down memory lane, and see for ourselves if Joe Biden and Barack Obama were without a ‘whisper of scandal’. Careless whisper indeed.

The Top 7 Scandals of the Obama Administration:

  1. OPERATION ‘FAST AND FURIOUS’: A federal operation dubbed Fast and Furious allowed weapons from the U.S. to pass into the hands of suspected gun smugglers so the arms could be traced to the higher echelons of Mexican drug cartels. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which ran the operation, has lost track of hundreds of firearms, many of which have been linked to crimes, including the fatal shooting of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry in December 2010. source
  2. OBAMA USED THE IRS TO TARGET CONSERVATIVE GROUPS: The U.S. Justice Department has reached a settlement with dozens of conservative groups that claimed the Internal Revenue Service unfairly scrutinized them based on their political leanings when they sought a tax-exempt status, court documents showed. In a pair of lawsuits filed in federal court in 2013, the conservative groups accused the IRS of targeting organizations with such words as “Tea Party” or “patriots” when they applied to the agency for tax-exempt status starting in 2010. “We hope that today’s settlement makes clear that this abuse of power will not be tolerated,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement on Thursday. The IRS admitted it was wrong when it based screenings of the groups’ applications on their names or policy positions, subjected the groups to heightened scrutiny and delays and demanded unnecessary information from the groups, the agreement in the Washington case said. The IRS “expresses its sincere apology,” it said. source
  3. THE 4 DEAD AMERICANS IN BENGHAZI: In a brazen attempt to rewrite history, President Barack Obama in a speech on Friday blamed “the politics of resentment and paranoia,” which he said had found a home in the Republican Party, for “wild conspiracy theories – like those surrounding Benghazi.” What a reprehensible way to frame an event that killed four Americans while they waited for rescue and protection they deserved from people Barack Obama never sent.  Of course, you only heard about Obama’s characterization of Benghazi if you pay attention to conservative media.  By and large the mainstream press excluded references to Benghazi from their reporting of the speech. Barack Obama took us to war with Libya. His State Department refused multiple requests to meet minimum security standards at the Benghazi consulate. President Obama never sent anyone to rescue or protect our ambassador or our own people during the 13 hours they were under attack.  Four brave men died as a result and many other heroes had their lives forever altered. That is not a conspiracy.  That is fact – no matter how inconvenient Democrats may find it.  Four Americans died in the 2012 Benghazi attack: Ambassador Chris Stevens, Information Officer Sean Smith, and two CIA operatives, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, both former Navy SEALs. Stevens is the first U.S. ambassador killed in an attack since Adolph Dubs was killed in 1979. Senior intelligence officials later acknowledged that Woods and Doherty were contracted by the Central Intelligence Agency, not the State Department as previously identified, and were part of Global Response Staff (GRS), a team that provides security to CIA case officers and counter surveillance and surveillance protection. source
  4. THE LIE OF ‘LIKE YOUR DOCTOR, KEEP YOUR DOCTOR’: This was such an egregious lie that even left-wing PolitiFact dubbed it as the “Lie of the Year” in 2013. Just like his broken promise about being able to keep their insurance plans, this was a lie that Obama repeated numerous times. It goes without saying that when people lose their insurance, they likely lose their doctor as well. Even the Obamacare website scrubbed any reference to the lie about being able to keep your doctor. source
  5. OBAMA BROKE LAW BY PAYING $5 BILLION TO GET BACK US ARMY DESERTER: The GAO cited the fact that the Pentagon or Obama did not notify Congress 30 days before they transferred the five prisoners. They also said the DoD “wrongly used $988,400 from a wartime appropriations to facilitate the transfer,” said the report. “Our report finds that the Administration clearly broke the law in not notifying Congress of the transfer,” declared committee chairman Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-TX). “Leading up to the transfer, DOD officials misled Congress as to the status of negotiations. Pentagon officials best positioned to assess the national security risks were left out of the process, which increases the chances of dangerous consequences from the transfer.” source
  6. OBAMA ALLOWED RUSSIANS TO INTERFERE WITH ELECTION THEN BLAMED IT ON TRUMP: A prominent Democratic strategist said the Obama administration should have been more proactive about curbing Russian influence in the election. Mary Anne Marsh, once a senior adviser for former Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., told Fox News that she did not “believe the Obama team and President Obama did enough,” even though there were clear signs of Russian intent to manipulate the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. The former Kerry adviser said she believes the Obama administration had a duty to go above the Senate’s objection to issuing a bipartisan joint resolution addressing the Russia concerns. source
  7. OBAMA ILLEGALLY SENT CASH RANSOM TO IRAN: The Obama administration followed up a planeload of $400 million in cash sent to Iran in January with two more such shipments in the next 19 days, totaling another $1.3 billion, according to congressional officials briefed by the U.S. State, Treasury and Justice departments. The cash payments—made in Swiss francs, euros and other currencies—settled a decades-old dispute over a failed arms deal dating back to 1979. U.S. officials have acknowledged the payment of the first $400 million coincided with Iran’s release of American prisoners. source

Now these are just what we feel to be the 7 most important scandals of the Obama administration, but by no means a complete listing of them. For the time would fail us to recount the Solyndra scandal, the DOJ targeting conservative reporters scandal, the Clinton email scandal, and the list literally goes on, and on and on ad infinitum.

Isn’t it great that we can finally do an article on Creepy Joe that doesn’t centered around inappropriate touching of women and molesting young girls?

The Story That Creepy Joe And The Liberal Media Are Pushing

This Is How The Obama Administration Really Happened

Now The End Begins is your front line defense against the rising tide of darkness in the last days before the Rapture of the Church

HOW TO DONATE: Click here to view our GoFundMe page

When you contribute to this fundraising effort, you are helping us to do what the Lord called us to do. The money you send in goes primarily to the building of the recording studio, but it also goes to the overall daily operations of this site. When people ask for Bibles, we send them out at no charge. When people write in and say how much they would like gospel tracts but cannot afford them, we send them a box at no cost to them for either the tracts or the shipping, no matter where they are in the world. Even all the way to South Africa. We even restarted our weekly radio Bible study on Sunday nights again, thanks to your generous donations.

nteb-gospel-tracts-street-preaching-end-time-last-days-bible-prophecy-dl-moody

CLICK IMAGE TO ORDER YOUR BOX OF NTEB GOSPEL TRACTS

But whatever you do, don’t do nothing. Time is short and we need your help right now. If every one of the 12,621 people on our daily mailing list gave $4.50, we would reach our goal immediately. If every one of our 151,781 followers on Facebook gave $1.00 each, we would reach 300% of our goal. The same goes for our 13,600 followers on Twitter. But sadly, many will not give, so we need the ones who can and who will give to be generous. As generous as possible.

“Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;” Titus 2:13 (KJV)

“Thank you very much!” – Geoffrey, editor-in-chief, NTEB

HOW TO DONATE: Click here to view our GoFundMe page

 


 

 

Continue Reading

Benghazi Coverup

Crooked Hillary Amazingly States That ‘Not A Single American Life Was Lost’ In Benghazi, Libya

Crooked Hillary Clinton declared during NBC News’s Commander-in-Chief forum that no lives were lost in Libya when she made the move to take out dictator Muammar Gaddafi.

Published

on

crooked-hillary-clinton-says-no-american-lives-lost-libya-benghazi
NOW THE END BEGINS SHARE:

Hillary Clinton declared during NBC News’s Commander-in-Chief forum that no lives were lost in Libya when she made the move to take out dictator Muammar Gaddafi.

Even so, the former secretary of state did not mention the fact that 11 months later four Americans — including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens — were killed in a terrorist attack in Benghazi that arose from the instability that the overthrow created.

Hillary Clinton, Benghazi “What’s The Difference?” Four Dead Americans

“With respect to Libya, again, there’s no difference between my opponent and myself,” Clinton stated, attempting to dismiss her hawkish-foreign policy record. “He’s on record extensively supporting intervention in Libya when Qaddafi was threatening to massacre his population. I put together a coalition that included NATO, included the Arab League, and we were able to save lives.”

Hillary Makes Bald-Faced Lie About Libya – ‘We Didn’t Lose A Single Person’

“We did not lose a single American in that action,” she declared.

Clinton was referencing the 2011 overthrow of Mummer Gaddafi that left Libya in chaos, where less than a year later the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi was attacked, killing Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods ,and Glen Doherty.

Clinton stood by her decision with regards to Libya.

“And I think taking that action was the right decision,” she continued. “Not taking it and permitting there to be an ongoing civil war in Libya would have been as dangerous and threatening as what we are now seeing in Syria.” source

Continue Reading

Trending