US Casualty Rate In Afghanistan Under Obama Increases 500%, Yet No Antiwar Protests. Why?
So where is Code Pink?
Remember all the Liberal antiwar protesters who camped out in front of Bush’s ranch in Crawford, TX? They stayed there for well over a year, made all the headlines, and demanded that our troops be brought home. Seemed like a worthy cause, right? So, now that the US death toll in Afghanistan has increased 500% under Obama, I have yet to hear one, single word of protest, not to mention our current illegal war in Libya. Seems like Code Pink was not antiwar war death, they were only anti-Bush.
“The average monthly casualty rate for U.S. military forces serving in Afghanistan has increased 5-fold since President Barack Obama was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2009.
1,540 U.S. troops have been killed in Afghanistan since Oct. 7, 2001, when U.S. forces began fighting in that country to oust the Taliban regime that had been harboring al Qaeda and to track down and capture or kill al Qaeda terrorists.
During the Bush presidency, which ended on Jan. 20, 2009 with the inauguration of President Obama, U.S. troops were present in Afghanistan for 87.4 months and suffered 570 casualties—a rate of 6.5 deaths per month.During the Obama presidency, through today, U.S. troops have been present in Afghanistan for 29.1 months and have suffered 970 casualties—a rate of 33.3 deaths per month.
The 970 U.S. casualties that have occurred while President Obama has been commander in chief equal 63 percent–or almost two-thirds—of all U.S. casualties that have taken place in the nearly-ten-year-long war.
889 of the 970 U.S. casualties in Afghanistan that have occurred during the Obama presidency—or about 92 percent—have been combat-related casualties. During Obama’s presidency, U.S. troops have given their lives in the service of their country in Afghanistan at an average rate of more than one per day.” source – CNS News
|Print article||This entry was posted by NTEB News Desk on June 23, 2011 at 8:46 am, and is filed under Liberals. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.|
about 3 days ago - 34 comments
about 3 days ago - 32 comments
about 1 week ago - 322 comments
about 1 week ago - 115 comments
about 2 weeks ago - 226 comments
about 2 weeks ago - 36 comments
about 2 weeks ago - 81 comments
about 3 weeks ago - 39 comments
about 3 weeks ago - 52 comments
about 3 weeks ago - 179 comments