THE WISE SHALL UNDERSTAND

Obama Threatens Netanyahu, Demands Israel Make Peace Or Face Isolation

| March 3, 2014

Bloomberg: When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visits the White House tomorrow, President Barack Obama will tell him that his country could face a bleak future — one of international isolation and demographic disaster – if he refuses to endorse a U.S.-drafted framework agreement for peace with the Palestinians. Obama will warn Netanyahu that time is running out for Israel as a Jewish-majority democracy. And the president will make the case that Netanyahu, alone among Israelis, has the strength and political credibility to lead his people away from the precipice.

obama-threatens-netanyahu-demands-israel-make-peace-with-palestinians-or-face-isolation

In an hourlong interview Thursday in the Oval Office, Obama, borrowing from the Jewish sage Rabbi Hillel, told me that his message to Netanyahu will be this: “If not now, when? And if not you, Mr. Prime Minister, then who?” He then took a sharper tone, saying that if Netanyahu “does not believe that a peace deal with the Palestinians is the right thing to do for Israel, then he needs to articulate an alternative approach.” He added, “It’s hard to come up with one that’s plausible.”

Unlike Netanyahu, Obama will not address the annual convention of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel lobbying group, this week — the administration is upset with Aipac for, in its view, trying to subvert American-led nuclear negotiations with Iran. In our interview, the president, while broadly supportive of Israel and a close U.S.-Israel relationship, made statements that would be met at an Aipac convention with cold silence.

Obama was blunter about Israel’s future than I’ve ever heard him. His language was striking, but of a piece with observations made in recent months by his secretary of state, John Kerry, who until this interview, had taken the lead in pressuring both Netanyahu and the Palestinian leader, Mahmoud Abbas, to agree to a framework deal. Obama made it clear that he views Abbas as the most politically moderate leader the Palestinians may ever have. It seemed obvious to me that the president believes that the next move is Netanyahu’s.

There comes a point where you can’t manage this anymore, and then you start having to make very difficult choices,” Obama said. “Do you resign yourself to what amounts to a permanent occupation of the West Bank? Is that the character of Israel as a state for a long period of time? Do you perpetuate, over the course of a decade or two decades, more and more restrictive policies in terms of Palestinian movement? Do you place restrictions on Arab-Israelis in ways that run counter to Israel’s traditions?”

During the interview, which took place a day before the Russian military incursion into Ukraine, Obama argued that American adversaries, such as Iran, Syria and Russia itself, still believe that he is capable of using force to advance American interests, despite his reluctance to strike Syria last year after President Bashar al-Assad crossed Obama’s chemical-weapons red line.

“We’ve now seen 15 to 20 percent of those chemical weapons on their way out of Syria with a very concrete schedule to get rid of the rest,” Obama told me. “That would not have happened had the Iranians said, ‘Obama’s bluffing, he’s not actually really willing to take a strike.’ If the Russians had said, ‘Ehh, don’t worry about it, all those submarines that are floating around your coastline, that’s all just for show.’ Of course they took it seriously! That’s why they engaged in the policy they did.”

I returned to this particularly sensitive subject. “Just to be clear,” I asked, “You don’t believe the Iranian leadership now thinks that your ‘all options are on the table’ threat as it relates to their nuclear program — you don’t think that they have stopped taking that seriously?”

Obama answered: “I know they take it seriously.”

How do you know? I asked. “We have a high degree of confidence that when they look at 35,000 U.S. military personnel in the region that are engaged in constant training exercises under the direction of a president who already has shown himself willing to take military action in the past, that they should take my statements seriously,” he replied. “And the American people should as well, and the Israelis should as well, and the Saudis should as well.”

I asked the president if, in retrospect, he should have provided more help to Syria’s rebels earlier in their struggle. “I think those who believe that two years ago, or three years ago, there was some swift resolution to this thing had we acted more forcefully, fundamentally misunderstand the nature of the conflict in Syria and the conditions on the ground there,” Obama said. “When you have a professional army that is well-armed and sponsored by two large states who have huge stakes in this, and they are fighting against a farmer, a carpenter, an engineer who started out as protesters and suddenly now see themselves in the midst of a civil conflict — the notion that we could have, in a clean way that didn’t commit U.S. military forces, changed the equation on the ground there was never true.”

He portrayed his reluctance to involve the U.S. in the Syrian civil war as a direct consequence of what he sees as America’s overly militarized engagement in the Muslim world: “There was the possibility that we would have made the situation worse rather than better on the ground, precisely because of U.S. involvement, which would have meant that we would have had the third, or, if you count Libya, the fourth war in a Muslim country in the span of a decade.”

Obama was adamant that he was correct to fight a congressional effort to impose more time-delayed sanctions on Iran just as nuclear negotiations were commencing: “There’s never been a negotiation in which at some point there isn’t some pause, some mechanism to indicate possible good faith,” he said. “Even in the old Westerns or gangster movies, right, everyone puts their gun down just for a second. You sit down, you have a conversation; if the conversation doesn’t go well, you leave the room and everybody knows what’s going to happen and everybody gets ready. But you don’t start shooting in the middle of the room during the course of negotiations.” He said he remains committed to keeping Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and seemed unworried by reports that Iran’s economy is improving.

On the subject of Middle East peace, Obama told me that the U.S.’s friendship with Israel is undying, but he also issued what I took to be a veiled threat: The U.S., though willing to defend an isolated Israel at the United Nations and in other international bodies, might soon be unable to do so effectively.

“If you see no peace deal and continued aggressive settlement construction — and we have seen more aggressive settlement construction over the last couple years than we’ve seen in a very long time,” Obama said. “If Palestinians come to believe that the possibility of a contiguous sovereign Palestinian state is no longer within reach, then our ability to manage the international fallout is going to be limited.”

We also spent a good deal of time talking about the unease the U.S.’s Sunni Arab allies feel about his approach to Iran, their traditional adversary. I asked the president, “What is more dangerous: Sunni extremism or Shia extremism?”

I found his answer revelatory. He did not address the issue of Sunni extremism. Instead he argued in essence that the Shiite Iranian regime is susceptible to logic, appeals to self-interest and incentives.

“I’m not big on extremism generally,” Obama said. “I don’t think you’ll get me to choose on those two issues. What I’ll say is that if you look at Iranian behavior, they are strategic, and they’re not impulsive. They have a worldview, and they see their interests, and they respond to costs and benefits. And that isn’t to say that they aren’t a theocracy that embraces all kinds of ideas that I find abhorrent, but they’re not North Korea. They are a large, powerful country that sees itself as an important player on the world stage, and I do not think has a suicide wish, and can respond to incentives.”

This view puts him at odds with Netanyahu’s understanding of Iran. In an interview after he won the premiership, the Israeli leader described the Iranian leadership to me as “a messianic apocalyptic cult.”

I asked Obama if he understood why his policies make the leaders of Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries nervous: “I think that there are shifts that are taking place in the region that have caught a lot of them off guard,” he said. “I think change is always scary.” source – Bloomberg

About the Author:

NTEB is run by end times author and editor-in-chief Geoffrey Grider. Geoffrey runs a successful web design company, and is a full-time minister of the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ. In addition to running NOW THE END BEGINS, he hosts a twice-weekly bible study and prophecy radio show on BlogTalk Radio, and oversees a dynamic street preaching outreach and tract ministry team in Saint Augustine, FL.
×

13 Comments on "Obama Threatens Netanyahu, Demands Israel Make Peace Or Face Isolation"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Mario says:

    So Obama is tough with Israel but acts like a girl related to Putin. Wow.

  2. Actually it seems that America is the one in isolation!

  3. Hope says:

    Any thought that BO is weak on Ukraine and strong on Israel is, in my view, mistaken. He has effectively orchestrated the US position in geopolitics to be exactly opposite from what most of us think it should be. He is unbelievably effective in manipulating the global scene, but not for our benefit. We are pawns in his game and now get to sit helplessly by while he puts the finishing touches on his plan to reshape the world. Come quickly, Lord Jesus.

  4. Jimmy says:

    Obama is a tool of Satan. Genesis 12:3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

  5. Everything is lining up real nice Biblically speaking.

  6. Who does this arrogant upstart Obama think he is? He has no right to dictate to another country what their politics should be. And all Obama is concerned with is “Advancing American interests” in Israel. He doesn’t care a jot about Israel, he only cares about American interests. He is an absolute fool. And now he has engaged in some standard sabre-rattling with Russia, and made certain implied threats. But he won’t carry them, because he doesn’t have the backbone to go to war against Russia. So he turns his attention to making idle threats against Israel. And for all that he has said, he needs only look in the Bible to understand what the true future position of Israel will be. God has declared many time in His Word, that He alone will Bless and protect His people Israel. I think that Obama should quite while he has still a bit of credibility left. At the end of this term of office, he will be out of the way, and some other poor man will have the job of trying to clean up the mess he has created.

  7. Mike says:

    Agreed David, Obama has put his agenda into
    overdrive, along with his big mouth ! Isreal is
    the apple of Gods eye ! and will prevail.

  8. MRH says:

    “Any thought that BO is weak on Ukraine and strong on Israel is, in my view, mistaken. He has effectively orchestrated the US position in geopolitics to be exactly opposite from what most of us think it should be. He is unbelievably effective in manipulating the global scene, but not for our benefit. We are pawns in his game and now get to sit helplessly by while he puts the finishing touches on his plan to reshape the world.

    @Hope: Actually BO is just a puppet of the elite, like are the other kings, queens, bishops, horses, etc. Anyway, their end goal is globalization, depopulation, and enslavement (we the people are but pawns in the wicked game). And the bible is crystal clear in matters – 2 BEASTS ;-)

  9. Kathy says:

    I emailed Mr. Bloomberg this morning and asked why he didn’t pose the question to Obama, “How do you commit to peace with a people whose sworn vow is to wipe Israel off the map?”

    Of course I don’t expect an answer but I’m tired of none of these “reporters”addressing the obvious elephant in the room!

  10. C.A. says:

    Netanyahu vs. Obama = Winston Churchill vs. Daffy Duck
    With a ‘leader’ who is blatantly smacking Israel in the face, America will get darker and darker. The Lord told us to love and pray for Israel. Please pray for God’s mercy on us. And pray that an impeachment movement will commence immediately.

  11. MRH says:

    @C.A.: Prophecy will prevail ;-)

  12. Boris Bear says:

    How sad that Obama bows to the Muslims, and turns
    his back on our truest ally in the Middle East. And
    Congress sits silently, the public is mute. Write your
    Senators and Congressmen about this outrage.

  13. Obama thinks he’s against Israel but actually he’s against God!

Mudflower website and graphic design Jacksonville, FL